data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93b81/93b81d4ab2c899dc51789b7914bfab18efbbcf7d" alt=""
Check out this article on cultural relevance.
Discuss if you're not sick of hearing about it by now!
I enjoyed reading the article. Here's some of my input:
I hear the term "cultural relevance" so many times, I'm almost numb to it. Yet I'm beginning to embrace a new perspective on the subject. I believe that being culturally relevant is to minister the gospel in a way that particular culture understands while not pushing the "extra" standards of another.
I believe meeting the needs of the culture you are ministering to should be the TOP priority when wishing to be culturally relevant. Changing your standards of living or in the name of cultural relevance is insane (if God indeed called you to live by those standards). If I have a conviction against drinking, and if I go to Germany where EVERYBODY drinks, do I preach against someone having a beer, or do I change my standard and begin drinking beer myself? - NEITHER! I live by my conviction and preach the gospel (maybe against drunkenness) so that someone can come to Christ.
You can't have a Bible belt southern-gospel style church service in the inner city of Chicago or New York City expecting the urban society to receive, nor can you can't integrate hip-hop style worship into a southern-gospel style church in a rural town of white folks. You have to speak the "language" of those you are ministering to so that they can receive.
That's my take on responsible cultural relevance. Anybody?
1 comment:
OK...my only comment at this point is that the deacon in Southern Arkansas WOULD NOT throw the offender off the property...he would be THE ONE smoking!
Post a Comment